/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) construction grammar (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: construction grammar
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : ^[64]Periñán-Pascual (2013) points out that Goldberg’s broad conception of construction in Construction Grammar (CxG) makes it difficult to provide an accurate definition of the term since from her point of view any single lexical item (or even a suffix such as -ed) could be conceived as a construction: “all levels of grammatical analysis involve constructions” (Goldberg, 2006: 5 ). This implies that, within this broad definition, constructions are conceived as the building blocks in linguistic realization. Periñán-Pascual’s conception of construction differs from CxG and is closer to the LCM in the sense that constructions are viewed from a holistic perspective in which the meaning of the construction is always larger than the meaning of the building blocks conforming it. What is more, Periñán-Pascual (2013) shares ^[65]Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez’s (2013) claim that for any linguistic pattern to be regarded as a construction some essential properties have to be met. Thus, the following criteria
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines500 - : Bergen, B. K. & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive groundings and theoretical extensions (Constructional approaches to language 3 ) (pp. 147-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [ [99]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato construction grammar:
1) constructions: 3 (*)
2) periñán-pascual: 3
construction grammar
Lengua:
Frec: 29
Docs: 9
Nombre propio: 2 / 29 = 6%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.645 = (1 + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+4.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| construction grammar |
: Barres, V. & Lee, J. (2014). Template construction grammar: From visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism. Neuroinformatics, 12(1), 18-208. : Bergen, B. & Chang, N. (2013). Embodied construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 168-190). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Boas, H. & Sag, I. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. : Boas, H. (2011). Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics, 49(6), 1271-1303. : Boas, H. C. & Sag, I. A. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. Palo Alto Ca.: CSLI Publications. : Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Dodge, E. & Petruck, M. (2014). Representing caused motion in Embodied Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 workshop on semantic parsing (pp. 39-44). Baltimore: Maryland. : Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. En G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365-378). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Fillmore, C. (2006). The articulation of lexicon and constructicon. Plenary talk at the Fourth International Construction Grammar Conference (pp. 53-63). University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. : Fillmore, C. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of EURALEX13 (pp. 49-68). Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. : Fillmore, C., Lee-Goldman, R. & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet Constructicon. In H. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 309-372). Stanford, CA: CSLI. : Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/Londres: The University of Chicago Press. : Goldberg, A. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions, a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. : Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. : Sag, I. (2011). Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. C. Boas & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 69-202). Stanford: CSLI. : Steels, L. & van Trijp, R. (2011). How to make Construction Grammars fluid and robust. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 301-330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Steels, L. (Ed.) (2011). Design patterns in fluid construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins . : Steels, L. (Ed.) (2017). Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar [on line]. Retrieved from: [125]https://www.fcg-net.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/basics-of-fcg.pdf. : Torrent, T., Meireles Lage, L., Fernandes Sampaio, T., da Silva Tavares, T. & da Silva Santos, E. (2014). Revisiting border conflicts between FrameNet and Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 6(1), 33-50. : Van Trijp, R. (2011). A design pattern for argument structure constructions. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 115-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |